PTT偶像團體區 / KingofPop (麥可傑克森 - Michael Jackson)

[情報] Rolling Stone最新更新MJ各專輯評分

看板KingofPop (麥可傑克森 - Michael Jackson)作者ChesterB (很難想)時間15年前 (2010/08/19 12:26)推噓21(21推 0噓 9→)

留言30則, 23人參與討論串1/1

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/artist/album/news/artists/8865/65326/65367 滾石雜誌今年更新了MJ各大專輯的評分下面文字部分還沒空細讀看有沒有好心人士有空翻譯一下先貼一下評分表 ★★★★½ Off the Wall (Epic, 1979) ★★★★★ Thriller (Epic, 1982) ★★ Anthology (Motown, 1986) ★★★½ Bad (Epic, 1987) ★★ Dangerous (Epic, 1991) ★★★ HIStory Past Present and Future—Book 1 (Epic, 1995) ★★★ Blood on the Dance Floor: HIStory in the Mix (Epic, 1997) ★ Invincible (Epic, 2001) ★★★★ Number Ones (Epic, 2003) ★★★ The Ultimate Collection (Epic/Legacy, 2004) ★★★★★ Thriller: 25th Anniversary Edition (Epic/Legacy, 2008) ★★★★ Hello World: The Motown Solo Collection (Hip-O Select, 2009) ★★ Michael Jackson: The Stripped Mixes (Motown/Universal, 2009) ★★½ Michael Jackson: The Remix Suite (Motown/Universal, 2009) ★★★★ Michael Jackson's This Is It (Sony, 2009) 雖說樂評看看就好但我還是要抱怨一下以下是個人意見我只能說滾石的樂評耳朵也太離譜了吧有沒有Bias的太過嚴重怪不得MJ生前覺得滾石對他有歧視的嫌疑 Invincible向來樂評都不太愛但從當年的三分下修到一分有沒有太扯再怎樣這張也不可能慘到一分吧這還不是最扯的 Dangeorus的分數我深深懷疑打錯了當年給四分現在下修兩分是怎麼回事? 這張如果給兩分我只能說大概一堆專輯都該要給到負分了我還特地去讀了講Dangerous的文字部分看到底為何會兩分還真看不出所以然最搞笑的是一堆精選集居然都還三分甚至四分最無敵扯的是This is it居然四分這麼沒誠意的精選輯還鬧出保羅安卡事件還可以四分是怎麼一回事阿~~~ 到底哪來這麼不專業的樂評真不懂他的標準在哪 -- In a world filled with hate, we must still dare to hope. In a world filled with anger, we must still dare to comfort. In a world filled with despair, we must still dare to dream. In a world filled with distrust, we must still dare to believe. ~~~~By Michael Jackson -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 173.59.231.40 ※ 編輯: ChesterB 來自: 173.59.231.40 (08/19 12:52)

推

Mr7

08/19 13:13, , 1^F

08/19 13:13, 1^F

→

yatan0525

08/19 13:13, , 2^F

08/19 13:13, 2^F

推

Scarecrowho

08/19 13:28, , 3^F

08/19 13:28, 3^F