[碗粿] 國際AV女優哈里發

看板LTK作者iskandar (東京銘粿御滿幸最中)時間4年前 (2020/07/10 14:24)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/1

https://factsbeatfiction.com/ bangbros終於跟mia khalifa翻臉了我們不能只聽一面之詞以免被花言巧語騙了 Facts Over Fiction Claim Mia has repeatedly stated she “only” made $12,000 in the adult industry. The Facts Mia received in excess of $178,000.00 from BangBros and its affiliated entities alone. We have no idea how much she made with the other 3 Adult Brands that she performed for BEFORE she performed for BangBros. Claim Mia has repeatedly stated she was only in the adult industry for 3 months. The Facts Mia performed with the adult Film and Cam industry from mid-late 2014 through July 2017. 2 years and 9 months to be exact. Claim Mia Khalifa has repeatedly claimed she told producers "you guys are going to get me killed" Source The Facts This statement never happened. In fact, Mia Khalifa had a lot of creative control over the ideas for the site and was fully behind each one. But don't just take our word for it, take hers. (Click here) Claim Mia has recently claimed 6 years later that she was manipulated into her Bangbros contract Source The Facts Mia Khalifa was never manipulated into signing her contract. In fact, she renewed her contract for more years and negotiated different terms into it. She actually, was quite excited to be on contract as you can see here. Claim Mia has repeatedly suggested the famous "hijab scene" was her second scene and she has suggested she only ever filmed for BangBros. The Facts Mia performed for 3 other studios under the stage name "Mia Callista," before shooting for BangBros and using the name "Mia Khalifa." For what it's worth, the "hijab scene" wasn't even her second video for BangBros. Claim Mia has stated she owns the trademark to “Mia Khalifa” The Facts Mia's registration of the Trademark was obtained by her making a sworn statement to the United States Patent & Trademark Office that no other party had the right to use the term "Mia Khalifa" in connection with adult entertainment. She made this representation despite having assigned to Bangbros the exclusive right to her stage name in connection with adult content in which Mia appeared. Claim Recently Mia has brought up a scene in which referenced protests surrounding the killing of an unarmed black man with the suggestion that BangBros was insensitive to this horrific act. The Facts This scene was produced by a third-party producer. We found the scene absolutely objectionable and it was removed almost immediately when it was posted 5 years ago. Claim Recently, Mia has claimed BangBros and others are intentionally pushing her content in response to her recent statements. The Facts NO, we have not been promoting or pushing her content. Obviously, it’s Mia’ s self-created, scandalous buzz she’s created. There’s a spike in viewing her content every time she talks about it. We can’t imagine Mia is surprised that when she talks about her porn content, people are going looking for her porn content.. You can see in the google trends graph below, that Mia Khalifa is struggling to stay relevant over the years and needs to attack Bangbros and the porn industry to stay relevant. Trying to bully people into removing your content is only going to lead to the Streisand effect. ====== 結果今年成人展成人勃不要說是黑森林連珍珠粉圓都看不到啦 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.169.114.173 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LTK/M.1594362273.A.1E1.html