Billboard的一個訪談~
as title....
It's been nine years since Axl Rose gave a substantial print interview. For
all that time and more, he's been working on the album "Chinese Democracy,"
which finally arrived in late November.
It was an arduous process, to say the least. Guns N' Roses haven't released a
new song since 1999 or an album since a 1993 set of covers. Since then, Rose
has toured sporadically, worked with a rotating cast of musicians -- he owns
the Guns N' Roses name, according to his attorney, Laurie Soriano -- and
recorded numerous versions of the same new songs. According to a 2005 article
in the New York Times, Universal Music Group had spent $13 million on
"Chinese Democracy" by then.
The album came out in the United States as a Best Buy retail exclusive and
debuted at No. 3 on the Billboard 200 with first-week sales of 261,000,
according to Nielsen SoundScan. To date, it has sold 537,000 copies in the
States, far fewer than the 1.3 million that Best Buy bought upfront,
according to the Wall Street Journal. But the album has sold 2.6 million
copies worldwide, according to Universal -- a number that counts only retail
purchases -- and the company plans to start promoting another single soon.
Some industry executives have blamed the album's disappointing sales on Rose,
who hasn't made a video, announced a tour or given interviews. Others point
to Best Buy, claiming the chain didn't make the album as visible as last
year's other major retail exclusive, AC/DC's "Black Ice," which was sold only
at Wal-Mart. Until now, Rose himself has remained silent, except for a series
of postings on some Guns N' Roses fan Web sites.
That doesn't mean he doesn't have plenty to say -- about his new album, his
former bandmates and his label, Interscope, a subsidiary of Universal. (The
label declined to comment.) Rose answered two series of questions via e-mail,
in which he discussed for the first time the events surrounding the release
of "Chinese Democracy" and his frustrations with Interscope.
In a separate phone interview, longtime Guns N' Roses (and former
Replacements) bassist Tommy Stinson echoed Rose's sentiments. Rose's answers
appear here almost exactly as he sent them, edited only for grammar, length
and clarity.
The obvious question: Why talk now? Rose says he "felt it was a good time to
address some of these issues publicly."
Some people thought "Chinese Democracy" would never come out. Were there
times during the making of the album when you felt that way yourself?
Axl Rose: Not so much that it wouldn't come out but that we could in some way
legally be forced to release it either incomplete or with so many business
areas unresolved that the beginning would be the end as well.
網址:http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/axl-speaks/interview.shtml
Without sounding presumptuous, what took so long to get the album out?
And without sounding facetious, what didn't? There aren't too many issues of
the hundreds [we ran into] that happened as quickly as anyone would have
preferred, from building my studio; finding the right players; never did find
a producer; still don't have real record company involvement or support; to
getting it out and mixed and mastered.
All that aside, it's the right record and I couldn't ask for more in that
regard. Could have been a more enjoyable journey, but it's there now. The art
comes first. It dictates if not the course [then] the destination
artistically.
For me, once the real accompanying artwork is there with a few videos and
some touring, the package was achieved and delivered.
And to do so at this level in terms of quality, both artistic and
performance-wise, both on record and live, is something that's a miracle at
minimum and something that wouldn't have happened, no matter how anyone tries
to convince others, with old Guns, regardless of anyone's intentions. It was
just as ugly in old Guns, regardless of our success.
What were your expectations in terms of what Best Buy would do to promote the
album?
Best Buy has been great. Going with Best Buy was a way to work out a deal
with Universal and we were fortunate enough to work with Irving [Azoff, as
manager] and deal more directly with Universal. I've asked for information
regarding their role in working the record but that hasn't come yet so I'm
not able to tell what Universal has or hasn't done, although Zach [Horowitz,
Universal Music Group president/COO], or whoever's behind the international
efforts, is doing great. It's more than appreciated and a welcome relief.
Unfortunately [going with Best Buy] didn't change us having to rely on
Interscope as much as we'd hoped. The opinions expressed or "jumped" on
publicly regarding promotion seem to be [about] my or our involvement with
mainstream media -- talk shows, rock magazines and dot-coms -- which have
generally held negative public stances toward myself or the band for years,
[and they] unfortunately have not been resolved. Efforts are being made to
understand the relationships and evaluate how best to proceed.
Our focus was in getting the record deal done while finishing the album,
which hit many an unexpected bump or sinkhole in the road right up until the
actual release. We never intended a huge public rollout, especially without
resolving certain issues, and no one ever suggested us doing so, though
Interscope's communications with Best Buy in these areas may not have been as
clear as anyone would have preferred.
Our approach, for better or worse, has always been to work the record over
the course of the following tour cycles, with attempts to forge new or better
and hopefully redefined relationships with the different forms of media that
may be interested along the way. In regard to our promotion, it was based
around certain agreements with Universal, Interscope, our management and
legal [teams] that unfortunately never happened. I won't get into specifics
but am beginning to address some of those issues in my own way as opposed to
"working together," and we'll see how that plays out.
網址:http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/axl-speaks/interview02.shtml
What are your thoughts on how Universal has handled the album?
Unfortunately I have no information for me to believe [that] there was any
real involvement or effort from Interscope. I'm not saying there wasn't. But
in my opinion, without [Interscope Geffen A&M chairman] Jimmy Iovine's
involvement, it doesn't matter who anyone talks to or what they say --
virtually nothing will happen from their end.
I do know [that] I've been asking for a marketing plan for over five years
and still haven't got anything. We've asked for a complete breakdown of
promotion expenses and efforts from all parties but unfortunately I've
received very little information, if anything, so far. On another note, the
draft booklet leaking and, I believe, the early shipping of preorders and the
inclusion of the early draft booklet for the release was through involvement
with Interscope, which was a mess. That's not to say they don't work for
other artists and make things happen. I feel they work very hard for whatever
it is they truly want to sell, whether it's good or ...
I can say how the band feels, and that is that to a man they hate the record
company other than Universal International with a passion. And that's with me
talking with them about the record company negatively hardly ever, if at all.
They're not blind: They hear the talk and see the results. Our involvement
with Interscope has been more than frustrating for them. It's not like anyone
here wants to have any negative views, impressions or opinions. They don't go
around bitching about things all the time and they don't let it get in the
way of whatever they're supposed to do here, but it is what it is.
Here's how things worked until they were no longer involved-that is, until
recently. Jimmy [Iovine] and whoever would come down to the studio. Things
would be good for a month. Then, according to whoever was involved at the
time from their side, someone above Jimmy would start putting pressure
regarding us on him, Jimmy would start pressuring others at his label [and
they] would begin doing the same with us. We get that it's just how business
-- and perhaps especially this business -- tends to work, but after a month
of this the whole thing would get ugly and extensively interfere with getting
anything productive done, and near the middle of the third month we'd arrange
for Jimmy to come down again. They'd go away happy and the entire process
would repeat itself over and over and over.
[Former Interscope Geffen A&M president] Tom Whalley brought in Roy Thomas
Baker to produce and [A&R executive] Mark Williams suggested Marco Beltrami,
among others, to play strings on the album. And Jimmy had an idea for low
guitar in a track and the EQ on a drum part. That's it as far as I'm aware.
They were all good things, but in all sincerity, that's it. Now, what efforts
were made to help keep Universal or Vivendi off us for as long as possible
could very well have been extensive, and in that regard either would have
been or would be most appreciated. I like Jimmy, but I've never understood
him in regard to us or this album. Everything's always been, "That's easy,"
or "We can fix that, no problem," but unfortunately rarely added up to any
kind of reality for us until [he found] Bob Ludwig for mastering.
We'd love to have their and Jimmy's support after this. But to continue at
this juncture feeling as we do, keeping things so behind the scenes,
unfortunately feels like the same 'ol same 'ol for all of us and, at least
momentarily, a bit much to digest. Jimmy did point us in the right direction
for mastering, and I believe he's sincere in his appreciation of our record
but still for whatever reasons gave up pretty early in those areas.
We feel that, unfortunately, we've never been really anything all that much
more other than a throw it at the wall, see if it sticks, no real ground
work, something to take advantage of, last quarter, cook the books,
write-off, fuck this headache, hoping to get lucky scam. And, unfortunately,
for all their nice words and assurances, nothing that's happened since the
week or so before the release has shown us much of anything to the contrary.
So at least in regard to the U.S., for the most part I don't look at it like
we have a record company -- I look at it for the most part like we have
friendly but otherwise cutthroat loan sharks, and we were lucky to get what
we got but feel we could have done more if they were at least, especially
with some of their backgrounds, a bit more involved creatively. So in light
of pirating and the mess the major labels are in, I have no sympathy for the
record companies, based on our experiences in the U.S.
網址:http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/axl-speaks/interview03.shtml
The last time Guns N' Roses had a new album out, the Internet was barely a
reality. What was your response to the nine-song leak this summer?
Having someone jeopardize your efforts so cavalierly is pretty much a
nightmare. I don't know that it hurt us though, at least as one might think.
Hard to say. That's not to imply leaks don't hurt artists, but that they were
earlier roughs and the level of sound quality is much higher with the finals.
That said, you have those who become emotionally attached to how the leaks
sound, which, for better or worse, usually isn't so great to contend with.
And it seems that those who often do so and complain publicly, oddly and
coincidentally, have a history of basically being detractors as well even if
they're somehow considered part of a "fan" base.
What's your take on the media response to the album?
It's been a mixed bag. Some has been great, others a blood bath. That said,
most of the nonsense has been from the same or the latest batch of negative
idiots, so it was to be expected and really doesn't mean much. [I] did see
some jump ship, and that's always funny. Watching some douche waving a flag
and then being the first punk in the water's always great.
Observers are interpreting some of the songs on "Chinese Democracy" as being
about the process of making the album. Is this valid?
I'd say there's a lot in the lyrics regarding the journey to make the album,
even if not in so many words.
Can you give an example of a song that the band nailed on an early take and
didn't change that much?
The basic concept of most songs stayed the same. "Riad [N' the Bedouins],"
"Sorry," "Better" and "Prostitute" are probably closer to their original
demos in ways than others.
How many other songs were completed and considered for "Chinese Democracy"?
There are rumors that there are two full albums done.
We'd like to get another album out at some point, but for now our focus is on
"Chinese."
Some artists like to test out their new songs in their car stereos or invite
friends to the studio to hear playbacks. How did you listen to the album when
it was a work in progress?
My studio, car stereos, a CD Walkman, computers and different speaker setups,
clubs, iPods. Actually, our first leaks were from using a sound system in a
strip club in the early hours when it was basically empty. I went there to
play the tracks for someone I was interested in working with. I'd gone there
with a guy who worked band security, who was allegedly somehow related to the
owners, feeling it was a bit more of a protected environment than it turned
out to be.
網址:http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/axl-speaks/interview04.shtml
Are you planning to tour?
No plans, but there's talk. Management and our promoters are really excited
with the offers coming in both here and worldwide.
Are you planning to make videos?
We're finalizing a video for "Better" and writing a couple others now. Over
time different ideas have been tossed around, written up or submitted but
that was then. Nothing we had come up with -- or at least the approaches so
far -- felt right. We have been discouraged from making a video all along by
Interscope, up until Best Buy requested one after the release, and in a
manner by Interscope then of, "So where's the video?," taking everyone more
than off guard.
There was talk of a "Guitar Hero" or "Rock Band" download of "Chinese
Democracy." Is either going to happen?
There is talk about a "Rock Band" release, and they felt the record-based on
the nature and complexity of the depth of instrumentation-deserved a bit more
attention and some more involved elements than they've generally dealt with.
I have no idea what that means but it's my understanding they were very
enthusiastic. We're looking at a Feb. 28 release, according to [executives at
MTV responsible for] "Rock Band." ["Rock Band" has since changed the release
date to spring.]
Is there any chance you'll work with the former members of Guns N' Roses in
the future?
I could see doing a song or so on the side with Izzy [Stradlin] or having him
out [on tour] again. I'm not so comfortable with doing anything having more
than one of the alumni. Maybe something with Duff [McKagan], but that's it,
and not something I'd have to really get down into, as I'd get left with
sorting it out and then blamed on top of it. So, no, not me.
In regards to Slash, I read a desperate fan's message about, what if one of
us were to die and looking back I had the possibility of a reunion now, blah
blah blah. And my thoughts are, "Yeah, and while you're at the show your baby
accidentally kicks a candle and burns your house down, killing himself and
the rest of your family."
Give me a fucking break. What's clear is that one of the two of us will die
before a reunion and however sad, ugly or unfortunate anyone views it, it is
how it is. Those decisions were made a long time ago and reiterated year
after year by one man.
There are acts that, once committed between individuals, they are what they
are. To add insult to injury almost day after day, lapsing into year after
year, for more than a decade, is a nightmare. Anyone putting his own personal
entertainment above everything else is sickening.
網址:http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/axl-speaks/interview05.shtml
This is the first interview you've done in a long time. Why have you been so
reluctant to do press now that the album is out?
Lots of reasons I've gone into elsewhere, but I can say why I'm doing this
one. First, because in all this time it's one of the first actually formally
presented: I was asked to consider it, I liked the questions and I felt it
was a good time to address some of these issues publicly. Also, because it's
my understanding that these answers may be "considered" for use with
Billboard.com and Reuters [with which Billboard has a syndication deal] and
this seemed like a wonderful opportunity to express myself accordingly.
With Reuters, I get their reach. That said, they've been particularly ugly
toward me and this band for years, with nearly everything they've written
being condescending or negatively judgmental with the cute little press trick
of using negative adjectives across the board whenever they've written
anything. In our regard they're one of the media outlets that appear to
continually attempt to set a tone for a negative mainstream public perception
regarding either us or myself, at least in the United States, if not the
world.
I get freedom of the press, but I'm not clear in regard to their writers or
those who choose to run their spin, why someone who no one's ever heard of
with so little "real" information is deemed qualified -- let alone allowed so
much corporate backing -- to promote negative and often completely inaccurate
and purely opinion-based (at best, if that) shots in forums with so much
exposure at the public's and our expense.
Billboard.com has generally taken a pro-Slash and -old Guns position as well,
and I don't recall having been particularly negative toward them previously
either. In my opinion it seems a bit less professional than tabloid in
nature. This is an attempt to begin sorting these things out when more than
shots across the bow have been taken by both of these organizations -- but
obviously much more so with Reuters -- if not a deliberate public stating of
both position and intention, in my opinion.
網址:http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/axl-speaks/interview06.shtml
Billboard的訪問。
Axl Rose又說了很多。
還沒仔細看。XD
--
I've got to keep breathing.
Because tomorrow, the sun will rise.
Who knows what the tide could bring?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.166.80.205
推
02/07 00:04, , 1F
02/07 00:04, 1F
推
02/08 22:56, , 2F
02/08 22:56, 2F
推
02/08 23:10, , 3F
02/08 23:10, 3F
GunsNRoses 近期熱門文章
PTT偶像團體區 即時熱門文章